Here’s our Lexpert summary of key developments in the area of Aboriginal law over the last year, including discussion of the recent Supreme Court decision in Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. v. Carrier Sekani Tribal Council — a key case involving issues such as the trigger for the duty to consult, which Crown agency has the duty to consult, and which tribunals should consider whether or not the duty had been fulfilled. The summary also touches on Beckman v. Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation, a Supreme Court case that considered how the duty to consult and accommodate applies when the underlying right flows from a modern treaty.
Lexpert 2011 final
Related Posts
Court quashes bid for Alberta independence referendum in favour of First Nations treaty rights
Friday, May 15, 2026
In a decision delivered May 13th, 2026, Justice Shaina Leonard of the Alberta Court of King’s Bench (the “Court”) has quashed the Chief Electoral Officer of Alberta’s (“CEO”) approval of an initiative petition on Alberta independence under the
Read More...
Ne’bwaakah giizwed ziibi: A Significant Ancestral Site Returned to Saugeen First Nation
Friday, May 8, 2026
On May 5th, 2026, Saugeen First Nation reclaimed something taken from them twice: first by colonial dispossession, and again in November 2022 when a property…
Read More...
OKT and McCarthy Tétrault LLP win Litigation Team of the Year at the 2026 Canadian Law Awards
Wednesday, May 6, 2026
On Tuesday, May 5, OKT and McCarthy Tétrault LLP were recognized for their outstanding work in Shamattawa First Nation v. Canada (Attorney General), 2025 FC 1927,…
Read More...