The issue of overlapping claims and shared territories is often a significant complicating factor for First Nations and resource developers attempting to reach Impact Benefit Agreements (IBAs). As many First Nations are aware, often having all the affected First Nations at one negotiating table does not always simplify the process. There is limited direction from the courts about how competing or overlapping claims/traditional territories will be dealt with in the resource development context. Our overall advice for proponents is to do their homework, understand the specific cultural context, listen carefully, and go slow. For First Nations and proponents alike it is a good idea to think long and hard about signing onto a joint IBA with multiple parties involved. Some situations are better suited for joint IBAs and other situations they may cause more headaches than they are worth.
Matt McPherson, “Overlapping Claims and Shared Territories”, Aboriginal Law, Webcast from The Old Mill, December 13, 2013 from Peter Mykusz on Vimeo.
Related Posts

Raising the Stakes - A Comparative Review of Canadian Mining Laws and Responsible Mining Standards
September 11, 2020
OKT is pleased to announce the release of the groundbreaking report: RAISING THE STAKES: A Comparative Review of Canadian Mining Laws and Responsible Mining Standards.
Canada…
Read More...
Ontario’s Proposed Bill 5 Will Be Devastating to Indigenous Rights and Interests
Monday, May 12, 2025 | Part 3
On April 17, 2025, the Government of Ontario introduced Bill 5, the dramatically-named Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act, 2025.
Read More...
Five Things to Know About the Repeal of the Endangered Species Act and the Introduction of the Species Conservation Act
Thursday, May 8, 2025 | Part 2
On April 17, 2025, the Government of Ontario introduced Bill 5, the dramatically-named Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act, 2025.
Read More...